"QUANTUM SHOT" #686 Link - article by M. Christian and Avi Abrams
Twist-n-Ride: Moving In Mysterious Ways (Even Sideways)
Ever since Mr. Bronze Age had the inspired thought that led to the wheel, humans have been trying to think of new ways to get from point A to point B. First British inventor Richard Lovell Edgeworth came up with the continuous track method of locomotion (which is just another way of saying "tracks on every tank and tractor", if you don't recognize the term).
("Snowbird 6" - Steve Brooks and his Ice Challenger team used a vehicle with screw-drive technology to be the first to cross the Bering Strait in 2001)
But in 1868 the American inventor Jacob Morath had a truly inspired idea: a screw-propelled vehicle. Don’t recognize that term either? That's not surprising because, even though many people today will celebrate its virtues, it's not exactly a common sight.
The basic idea of a screw-propelled vehicle is simple enough: instead of wheels or tracks, you build a vehicle with a pair of, as Wikipedia puts it "auger-like cylinders fitted with a helical flange." To make that a bit easier to understand, think of a machine that literally crawls along the ground on a pair of giant screws. To turn you use the same method a tank does: one screw either gets locked in place while the other one doesn't or, to make a 360 turn, turn one screw one way and the other ... well, the other way.
In 1907, James and Ira Peavey, were quite literally driven to create a practical screw-propelled machine to help their lumbering in Maine. The machine proved very useful since the screw-propulsion could move whatever you wanted moved through snow and mud and all kinds of nasty conditions. You also didn't need to worry about anything getting caught in the tracks, like with a caterpillar, and since they had much fewer moving parts they were easier to maintain.
Here's a 1929 version of a screw-drive tractor - Fordson Snow Machine concept (also watch video):
This "tractor" could tow twelve (!) tonnes of lumber behind it. Also check out the Chevrolet full-size screw-propelled snowmobile (see image below right):
Quite a few screw machines were built afterwards, though they remained less than popular. But when World War Two loomed, the idea of a screw-propelled war machine intrigued the eccentric genius Geoffrey Pyke -- who you no doubt remember as the inventor of the iceberg aircraft carrier.
Alas, Pyke's concept of a very small, very fast, attack machine got (ahem) shot down and his idea was eventually whittled down to the very-rarely known Weasel. Unfortunately, the Weasel was whittled down even more and the screw propulsion was dropped in favor of standard caterpillar tracks.
Left image image: a prototype of the Weasel (with screws)... which (alas) became the vehicle on the right, when the military was done with it.
Screw your way across the landscape
Some Russian WW2 screw-driven prototypes ended up in Nazi hand. No doubt, they were duly surprised to see this:
After the war the development continued, leading to a few working prototypes for Soviet Army:
("The Blue Bird", see more info and pics below)
Screws vs. Caterpillars
Another benefit screws have over caterpillars is the possibility of being amphibious. There's no reason, for instance, that the screws couldn't be hollow and so could also act as floats. During the Vietnam war, for example, Chrysler experimented with a screw-propelled machine. Unfortunately, their take on the technology didn't exactly wow the US military and the project was dropped.
The Soviets, in the meantime, had a machine specifically designed to go where no man ever wanted to go -- in their case to retrieve cosmonauts from remote landing sites: the poetically named ZIL-2906, or "Cosmonauts' Blue Bird":
Also watch the incredible video of screw propulsion in action - click here.
Crawl Sideways!
One of the most amazing uses of screw propulsion has to be Joseph Jean de Bakker's. In the 1960s the Dutch inventor created the Amphirol, a machine designed to take anyone pretty much anywhere. What made Joseph Jean de Bakker machine better than other versions of "screwing yourself across the landscape" was its performance.
Not only could his Amphirol go across marshes and over other sticky situations but it was also amphibious. That wasn't the end of its wow factor, though, because the Amphirol could do all that and also crawl sideways. Try doing that with four wheels or with caterpillar tracks - see Amhirol in action here.
Tyco Terrain Twister is a screw-driven vehicle toy which does a pretty good job ripping up terrain, considering its size (see the video here):
Russian engineer Alexey Burdin is promoting his TESH-drive version at his site Tesh-Lab. Here is one of many exciting renderings for the drive's usage, and the first prototypes are awaiting government funding:
One negative aspect to using such machinery is the possible impact on environment (witness its thick, wide tracks - quite a sizable "footprint"):
While still rare, the idea of screw-propulsion is still out there: the concept appearing in all kinds of civilian and military proposals. While watching one in action, though, William Cowper's quote comes immediately to mind: it "moves in a mysterious way."
BONUS: this is yet another unusual locomotion concept - for which we'd like to get more details, if you have any:
Saw one similar to this in Alaska a few years ago. Obviously abandoned, but appeared to be a tundra/snow vehicle. http://www.flickr.com/photos/thebonzey/3721297580/in/set-72157621327751455/
Why was this idea abandoned? The Fordson vehicle looked very capable. The only disadvantage I see is that it can't go on a paved road without causing damage. But many catepillar drive vehicles have the same problem
Considering the amount of mud this thing is removing, I would use it as bulldozer, but as a clever way to move around on any soil even if you can go practically anywhere. The energy consumption must be pretty high, which is surely why we still need to build flat roads and build bridges... Hum maybe a road and bridge companies conspiracy ? Good Lord.
Friction-free and all ground capable vehicules are the Holy Graal.
the chimera tank in fallout 3 is like this http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Chimera
theyr cool but not all that practical. good for really soft and nasty terrain but they tear up the land and i'm not sure if they can really run on asphalt or rock that well.
The mystery vehicle with barrel-tired tracks at the bottom lookslike a Russian equivalent of the Borg-Warner Air Roll and XM759 expeimental vehicles developed in America in the 1960s. More details here: http://www.amphibiousvehicle.net/frame.html (under "Bg to" about halfway down)
While the screw-propelled vehicles have definite advantages over tracked equivalents in thick, soupy mud, marshes and swamps, on ground they are much less efficient. They waste a lot of energy displacing soil, and skin friction of those rotating metal pontoons uses a lot more.
They still have a definite niche, and I'm surprised they aren't used for it.
The picture of the vehicle with several tires on a track is apparently a Soviet built version of the "Airoll" detailed here: http://www.unusuallocomotion.com/rubrique,airoll,1062281.html
the image under the headline "The Force is strong with this one" has some resemblance to the star wars movie poster (http://goo.gl/9Vie2) but it reminds me much stronger of the tron movie poster (http://goo.gl/DkUZJ). so maybe it's the grid calling instead of a strong force? =)
The lady with the MP44 could get some good money for it from collectors (it's amazing what accumulates in odd corners of the world). I'm also guessing the police ladies are in Egypt or another African Arab country. Some of them are too dark for Iranians and others are not wearing head scarfs. Exposed hair is a big no-no in Iran even for a civilian, let alone a cop.
The Picture with the title "Now this unique paving pattern was not caused by any earthquakes - but it did create an interesting urban landscape:" is showing the famous "Hundertwasserhaus" in Vienna - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundertwasserhaus regards
Bernard is correct - seismologists phased out the Richter Scale in the 1980s in favor of the moment-magnitude scale, in which an increase of 1 in magnitude is an increase of 32 in size.
About the pic w/ the laser-sneezing bunny: Is the dude w/ the 'stache about to snap the bald guy's neck? Mustache Dude: "You've seen too much..." Bald Guy: "huh?"
The 'nuclear hair' photo is of 60's fashion model Penelope Tree, hence the nest. My hair looks like that if I don't shower for a couple of days. Magnificent site - you've ruined all my notions of 'spare time!' Thanks.
Does anyone have a reference as to where the "fire breathing rabbit" is from. Specifically, was it a story, magazine, or book cover? And what is the name? Any story that has that as a cover is something I want to read.
The piano in the last photo isn't a grand piano; just a standard upright piano and a small one at that. Probably an Acrosonic-style drop action to fit in tight quarters. Still must have made sonar operators on other vessels a bit surprised to hear live piano music coming from the depths.
Excellent pictorial. For anyone who wants a sample of life on a sub without actually going underwater, I recommend the full-length version of Das Boot.
18 Comments:
Not sure if you've covered this previously. Seems like a similar concept: the sidewinder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJtpPyVM_y4
What about the Shagohod? You're showing off fictional accounts of screw driven vehicles, this one counts.
http://metalgear.wikia.com/wiki/Shagohod
Saw one similar to this in Alaska a few years ago. Obviously abandoned, but appeared to be a tundra/snow vehicle. http://www.flickr.com/photos/thebonzey/3721297580/in/set-72157621327751455/
This is a great idea and would eliminate some of the tires in the landfills.
Why was this idea abandoned? The Fordson vehicle looked very capable. The only disadvantage I see is that it can't go on a paved road without causing damage. But many catepillar drive vehicles have the same problem
Considering the amount of mud this thing is removing, I would use it as bulldozer, but as a clever way to move around on any soil even if you can go practically anywhere. The energy consumption must be pretty high, which is surely why we still need to build flat roads and build bridges... Hum maybe a road and bridge companies conspiracy ? Good Lord.
Friction-free and all ground capable vehicules are the Holy Graal.
the chimera tank in fallout 3 is like this http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Chimera
theyr cool but not all that practical. good for really soft and nasty terrain but they tear up the land and i'm not sure if they can really run on asphalt or rock that well.
Side ways? They looks pretty decent at going forward.
The mystery vehicle with barrel-tired tracks at the bottom lookslike a Russian equivalent of the Borg-Warner Air Roll and XM759 expeimental vehicles developed in America in the 1960s. More details here: http://www.amphibiousvehicle.net/frame.html (under "Bg to" about halfway down)
A good video of the Fordson in action can be found here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBjlSJf4274
While the screw-propelled vehicles have definite advantages over tracked equivalents in thick, soupy mud, marshes and swamps, on ground they are much less efficient. They waste a lot of energy displacing soil, and skin friction of those rotating metal pontoons uses a lot more.
They still have a definite niche, and I'm surprised they aren't used for it.
Thank you all for comments - wonderful info! will go into part 2
The picture of the vehicle with several tires on a track is apparently a Soviet built version of the "Airoll" detailed here:
http://www.unusuallocomotion.com/rubrique,airoll,1062281.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNNw2Fon1Ko
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNNw2Fon1Ko
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE8TVdwIuuE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsB1aE5IDT4&feature=related
Post a Comment
<< Home