Quick Search of DRB:
Lijit Search
drb rss about
suggest
advertise
subscribe
rss rss
rss

Monday, July 09, 2007

The Thermonuclear "Oops" List


"QUANTUM SHOT" #224
Article by guest blogger M. Christian



Good Night America... and Good Luck to us all

Welcome our guest blogger M. Christian ("Meine kleine fabrik" is a place where M.Christian (www.mchristian.com ) and s.a. (caferacersociety.blogspot.com) put some of the odd, weird, and wonderful things they've stumbled across or tripped over: art, history, machines, heroes, movies, music, and more. The only rule is that we try and make whatever goes up as unexpected as possible -- just like life.)

Accidents happen.

No one is immune: tyops typos slip in, numbers get misdialed, directions are screwed up. We all make them; no one is perfect.

Except that these mistakes involved thermonuclear weapons, and could easily have reduced a sizable hunk of this world to a Geiger-clicking pit. While I don’t have the time or the space to list all of them, here’s a sample of nuclear boo-boos guaranteed to make you at least look up the next time a plane scrawls a contrail across the sky, or go fishing.


(images credit: vintagephoto)

Just a few years after Oppenheimer and those wacky guys at the Manhattan Project turned a piece of the American desert into a glowing tourist spot, a B-36 putting its way from Alaska to Texas had a slight problem staying in the air. Luckily for the crew they managed to drop their bombs, which fell 8,000 feet, landing with a bang off the coast of British Columbia. Luckily for Canada only the bombs’ high explosives went off, not their nuclear cores. It was a very nice opening shot, a 1950 intro to "nuclear weapons accidents".



Eight years (and several similar accidents) later a bomber from Hunter Air Force Base, Georgia made a severe "oops" when it dropped its cargo of one nuclear device onto the backyard of the Gregg family in South Carolina. Fortunately for the Greggs, and South Carolina, again ONLY part of the bomb that went off was the ordinary component of the warhead which injured six members of that clan and made a nice divot in their garden: a hole 70 feet wide and 30 feet deep. The blast also took out five other houses and damaged a church. For almost irradiating a sizable hunk of the US, the Air Force coughed up $54,000.



One of my favorite atomic butter fingers is the one that almost plays out as a Zucker Bro’s gag: A bunch of US sailors at a Scottish base, rollicking it up, maybe wolf-whistling at some highland cutie, did a boo-boo and dropped (yes, I said dropped) a fully-armed Poseidon missile some twenty or so feet. It is pretty safe to say that the base laundry was very busy that night getting stains out of underwear.



Another tragic yet almost comedic incident of near nuclear devastation occurred in 1980, this time with almost Pythonesque timing. A sudden explosion in a Titan missile base near Little Rock, Arkansas popped the top of a silo off like a cheap champagne cork and tossed the missile’s 9 megaton warhead straight up. Landing some 1,000 feet away, it was later found to be pretty much intact.



Like said, this little piece is much too short to do into the couple ... no, wait, that isn’t quite fair, more like the dozens and dozens and DOZENS of nuclear weapons mishaps that have livened up the lives of US and international servicemen. But I haven’t even touched on the ones that got away.



Imagine if you will, some sport fisherman trying to forget a hectic few months at the office by hooking himself a handsome marlin. He’s out there, casting and reeling, casting and reeling, letting those stressful workdays melt off as he imagines how nice that deep sea beauty will look on his office wall, when he has a nibble, then a bite.

And, boy, what a bite!

In a hot flash of atomic fusion, the ocean for miles around simply vanishes in an expanding bubble of superheated steam. The shockwave travels through the surrounding ocean, a compression sledgehammer that kills everything it encounters, reducing life and the sea floor into component molecules. For a moment, the sun blooms under water.

It would be inaccurate to say that there are a few stray thermonuclear devices "floating" around out there because there are certainly more than a few.


(image credit: Pierre J.)

In 1957 a C-124 hauling three atomic devices from Delaware across the Atlantic suddenly developed serious engine trouble. The crew, rather than ride the nukes down to the briny deep, dropped their cargo somewhere between Rehobeth, Delaware, and Wildwood, New Jersey. Got that? Get your charts out and rent yourselves a boat or two, because there’s nuclear treasure to be found out there.

The very next year a B-47 smacked into another plane, spilling it’s own atomic cargo into the ocean off of Savannah, Georgia. They looked and they looked but they couldn’t find it. Savannah used to be quite a lovely city ....



Also in 1956 (not a very good year for the military) another B-47 bomber flying to Europe vanished without a trace. Poof! In addition to one very excellent aircraft, the Air Force also lost a nuclear device.

Somewhere sperm whales are using it for a back scratcher: in ‘65 an A-4E jet simply fell off the USS Ticonderoga as it steamed somewhere near the coast of Okinawa and sank in 20,000 feet of water. That little plane was also carrying one hellava large bomb and, somewhere in all that water and pressure, it’s still there.



The Russians have also had their own share of nuclear mishaps, and while we haven’t heard about most of them, the ones we HAVE heard of it are enough to make you pack your dehydrated beans and go live up in the hills. For instance, in 1986 a Soviet Yankee class nuclear sub sort of .... well, sank some 600 miles from Bermuda. In addition to its own nuke power plant, this fine example of Russian engineering was also carrying a few thermonuclear weapons ... 34 of them to be exact.



My all-time favorite, and the one that spawned this little trip to radioactive weirdness, is this little tidbit of Cold War fear. While it doesn’t rank with 34 missing warheads, you’ll see how that doesn’t necessarily mean that this story has what you’d call a happy ending.

In 1961 a B-52 decided to do a shake-and-shimmy over North Carolina, dropping two 24-megaton nuclear weapons. One of the little toys released its parachute and glided down to a less-than-gentle landing.



The other device though smacked down somewhere in waterlogged farmland. Not at sea, not in 20,000 feet of water, not "off the coast" of anywhere. Farmland, near North Carolina. Anyone live in North Carolina? Come on, a show of hands - gee, quite a few of you. Isn’t North Carolina a great place to live? You might, though, reconsider because even though this little boo-boo happened over twenty years ago the capable US military never recovered that little gizmo. It’s still out there. Tick, tick, tick, tick ....



I can hear some of you die-hard optimists mumbling something about "safety" and "redundant backups". Well, you just keep mumbling that comfortable little mantra to yourself while I casually bring up that other bomb, the one that parachuted down.

Well, while they found that little fissionable puppy, the guys that inspected it found something very interesting. You see, a device of that type has six safety devices -

- and five of them had failed.

Good night, America, and all the ships at sea. Sleep tight, don’t let the bed bugs bite, and always remember: accidents will happen.


(images credit: vintagephoto)

UPDATE:

On a positive note, as many comments (thank you) have pointed out:

"It is extremely difficult for a nuclear or thermonuclear weapon to go off accidentally. Unless every segment of the explosive shell is triggered simultaneously to create a uniform implosion wave that smoothly compresses your fissionable core to supercriticality, you're going to just get a messy conventional explosion that tosses fissionable material around. (Worst case is a fizzle where you get momentary criticality and a yield equivalent to a few tons.) Any weapon that's been sitting underwater for any length of time is going to be in much too bad a shape to have any meaningful risk of fission detonation."

Even as it is an assuring thought, still the massive accumulation of nukes presents tremendous risk, in many cases coming down to "the human error" - read this hair-raising account of close the world came to mutual annihilation in 1983 - Wikipedia article about Stanislav Petrov.

Source & further reading: List of Military Nuclear Accidents



Article by M. Christian, Meine Kleine Fabrik for Dark Roasted Blend.
(want to become our co-blogger? write to us, see guidelines here)

CONTINUE TO PART 2: BIOCHEMICAL OOPS LIST

"StumbleUpon" this page

Permanent Link...
Category: History,Weird, Military
Related Posts:
Cold War: Nuclear Fashion

Dark Roasted Blend's Photography Gear Picks:


READ LATEST POSTS:


Flags of Forgotten Countries

Don't just wave a black flag... consider your options

Biscotti Bits
Mixed Links & Images

incl. "Get Off the Earth!"

Most recent DRB-SF site update
Fall in Love with SF Again!

Two of the most entertaining SF novels from the 1980s
(for other weekly "Biscotti" issues - see our main page and monthly archives)

COMMENTS:

27 Comments:

Anonymous koshka said...

I think I need to go do some laundry...

___  
Anonymous julia said...

i couldn't decide whether to laugh out loud or take a good long drink... maybe both.


Funniest blog entry in a long time!

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

there is a small addendum to that story of the 5 failed safeties (out of six) .. unfortunately i never could find independent confirmation except in the book of a very respected austrian journaillist ... but perhaps a blogger can help ..

that incident prompted the US government to start a masive research project to improve the safeties in nuclear devices .. the results of this research project were quickly incorporated in the existing bombs .. AND .. here it comes:

the results were also supposedly leaked to the government of the CCCP because of the fear that a similar accident in russia could perhaps start an accidental war ..

___  
Blogger M.Christian said...

Very cool, Anonymous! Wish I had that info when I did the piece -- would have been a great addition. I, for one, am packing my beans and heading for the hills .. and that's NOT taking into account the technological 'expertise' of countries like Russia, France, Pakistan, India (shudder)

___  
Anonymous David Kraft said...

you are my FUD-bitch, you spread the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt and I reap the rewards of blowing more carbon with less efficiency.

Lets see a page about all the poor little children that died before we discovered polio vaccines.

How about a page about how many people die in car accidents every year oh, 40,000+ is to overwhelming for you.

Get a life and appreciate what we DO have - safe thermonuclear power, safe lands to live in from having thermonuclear warheads.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

...that's one way to look at things

___  
Blogger JJ said...

I do kinda hate to break it to you, but a drop, collision, or even explosion won't create the nuclear fission/fusion explosion that is the worry about nuclear weapons. The basic idea of a fission explosion is wrapping a sphere with explosives so the sphere will implode quickly enough that it will explode. Thermonuclear added more stages to create a bigger secondary explosion. But the difficultly in creating a spherical implosion is what prevents the average terrorist from making one. The Rosenburgs were executed when they passed secrets dealing with this to the Russian. That same difficulty is what prevents an accidental nuclear explosion.
Don't spread FUD. There are very legitimate fears you sort of addressed: Random weapons-grade materials and pre-made bombs missing, and the possibility of the conventional explosives spreading radioactive particles that really could cause alot of death. Plutonium has a lethal toxicity easily ranked in the parts per billion.
So there is definately legitimate concerns - just don't blow them to far out of porportion. I'd hate to see you have to get sued to pay alot of people's laundry bills.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only way to set off a fission bomb is for the outer shell of conventional warheads to all detonate within a few microseconds of each other. This just wont happen in the case of a drop or some other mishap. These devices require finely tuned electronic circuits to initiate simultaneous detonation.

I like your government-bashing energy, but please use it somewhere where the government is actually at fault.

___  
Blogger Sage Vivant said...

Great stuff! It's staggering to think about all these near-misses...

___  
Anonymous Chloe said...

My dad dropped a nuclear bomb while loading it on a plane on a Turkish runway during the Vietnam War. It rolled down the runway before they caught up to it. The officer who saw it said not to tell any one, because such accidents make it all the way to the president.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Luckily for the crew they managed to drop their bombs, which fell 8,000 feet, landing with a bang off the coast of British Columbia"

So that's why BC Bud grows so fast... :p

Great entry, and I don't think it's spreading of fear as much as it is sharing of information. Thank you.

___  
Blogger Matthew said...

You make a good point--accidents do happen.

But your post is alarmist. It's clear that you're trying to maximize fear. I don't think that's very responsible, and it shows a clear misunderstanding of the technologies you discuss.

The public's fear of the atom is reminiscent of the fear of electricity in the late 19th and early 20th century. Why don't you write a post about the dangers of electricity and associated accidents?

We're not going to be driving hydrogen cars tomorrow. Get used to the fact that harnessing the power of the atom is the most promising way forward /right now/.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I worked with one of the guys on the crew at the silo near Little Rock, AR, and he tells a bit of a different story.

Basically, someone dropped a huge wrench from the top of the silo, and as it bounced between the wall and the missile, it punctured the fuel tank. As the rocket fuel leaked out, the tank lost pressure and the rocket finally lost its support, crumpled, and exploded.

But this didn't happen suddenly. The leak took hours and hours to hit that critical drop in pressure. They evac'd the silo and everyone near it, but said nothing to the people living just miles away.

Still just as scary, though...

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Number of accidental nuclear explosions: 0

This is like saying a society is violent and dangerous because people get angry, even if the murder rate is zero.

BTW: Bombs decay and become non fissionable over time, especially if they are banged around and older than 15 years. So the fear mongering over the one's out there isn't even founded in reality.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this article shows a complete lack of understanding of how nuclear warheads work, as well as a blatant misuse of the word "thermonuclear" (that only applies to fusion, not fission). It's completely inaccurate to imply that any of those had a chance of going off.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You couldn't be more wrong on the story about two bombs landing in waterlogged famrland. A quick internet search reveals thatwhile two weapons were lost when the plane malfunctioned, the second one is not out there going "tick tick tick". In fact, they found the impact crater the bomb made and recovered a substantial portion of the material from the bomb after digging up to 22'. Heavy rainfall forced the abandonment of the recovery and the Air Force bought the land to prevent further digging. See this link for a factual description of events, it's much than this bullshit.
http://www.ibiblio.org/bomb/hansen_doc.html

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As JJ said, it is extremely difficult for a nuclear or thermonuclear weapon to go off accidentally. Unless every segment of the explosive shell is triggered simultaneously to create a uniform implosion wave that smoothly compresses your fissionable core to supercriticality, you're going to just get a messy conventional explosion that tosses fissionable material around. (Worst case is a fizzle where you get momentary criticality and a yield equivalent to a few tons.) Any weapon that's been sitting underwater for any length of time is going to be in much too bad a shape to have any meaningful risk of fission detonation.

This refers to implosion weapons, of course -- uranium-gun weapons are more rugged and mechanically straightforward, but they're also inefficient and have not been a part of the US arsenal for many decades.

Accidental detonation of a fusion weapon is even more vastly unlikely, since it requires a clean and efficient detonation of the fission primary to reach the temperatures necessary to initiate a fusion burn in the deuterium fuel.

Two other points: David Kraft, if only we had safe thermonuclear energy! So far the only way anyone's figured out to get more energy out a fusion reaction than you put in is a bomb, and the practical applications are limited. We've got plenty of (more or less safe) nuclear power, but no thermonuclear.

And, regarding leaking safeguard technology to the Soviets: certainly sounds plausible enough. I know that after PAL (Permissive Action Link) technology was developed in the US to prevent unauthorized launch or detonation of weapons, it was quite intentionally leaked to the Soviet Union, and to China when they began to develop their arsenal. The idea was to minimize the chance of a rogue military commander launching his weapons at the U.S. without authorization.

___  
Blogger Avi Abrams said...

Thank you for these great comments. I've updated the article, see above.

___  
Blogger M.Christian said...

Thanks to all of you great folks for your fun and/or informative comments on my little piece on nuclear weapon boo-boos. I especially appreciate the technical info that’s been put out, especially since I’m a writer and not an engineer. Avi is quite correct to place an amendment to the piece about how unlikely an actual nuclear detonation is. I also just learned (thanks Jon) that the supposedly “tick, tick, ticking” bomb that was dropped on North Carolina was recovered – though that it impacted at 700 mph doesn’t make me feel any better.

However (and didn’t you know this was coming) I still feel the spirit of the piece is still very much intact. I am not anti-government, anti-military, anti-nuclear, anti-America, or anti-much-of-anything: I just wanted to share with folks who are into odd and unusual history that there have been a considerable number of pants-staining mistakes made regarding the most dangerous device ever created.

Or, to put it in bad movie language: “I don't know what's scarier, losing a nuclear weapon or that it happens so often there's actually a term for it,” from Broken Arrow, starring the world’s favorite Scientologist, John Travolta.

In a follow-up piece I’ll be talking about something REALLY scary: screw-ups involving biological and chemical weapons.

Ciao,

M.Christian

___  
Blogger Vip Vop said...

Don't forget the Palomares incident..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palomares_H-Bomb_Incident

___  
Anonymous jim davies said...

Wow ... as scary as the article itself is, I can't believe the sheer naivete of the comments here. The people who've said either that losing nukes is no biggie, or that nuclear power is safe, need to do more research &/or seek professional help.

Nukes are not candy. Once lost, they can easily fall into the hands of unsavoury folks ... or simply leak extremely dangerous & long-lived isotopes into the environment. Explode, no - but they can still kill.

We have yet to invent a foolproof storage system for n-waste, & I doubt any such system is even physically possible. Wind, tidal & solar are all cheap & clean alternatives. We have no excuses left for continuing to neglect them in 2007.

Go tell former residents of Chernobyl how "safe" nuclear power is - they'll be relieved to hear it - the ones not dead of cancer yet, that is. The immediate death toll from that ONE accident is unknown, but indirect deaths from carcinomas likely number in the millions.

We need to avoid use of a technology that's both deadly & obscenely expensive, while we still can.

___  
Blogger joeythelemur said...

jim, no one has said that losing nukes is "no biggie". Most of these are reasonable comments pointing out that fears of a nuclear explosion from dropping a warhead are unfounded.

And before you cast stones, you should get your own facts straight. Regarding Chernobyl, you say "The immediate death toll from that ONE accident is unknown, but indirect deaths from carcinomas likely number in the millions."

Rubbish. While certainly a horrible tragedy that should never have happened, the death toll is estimated to be less than 10,000.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your "glowing" test area is nothing more than a broad, largely empty desert valley with some roads and an old farm house. Of course, if you know the history of it, it really is amazing, but at first glance it is nothing much to look at.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I love the whiners crying "waa FUD waa". Wonder how many "terrists" would love to get their hands on one, just for the scrap inside? You FUD-monkeys would shit your panties if one was found on your block.

Cool article. Made the FUD wieners weep.

___  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I loved reading all of this. My husband worked at Ellsworth with the trailers & equipment they use to load & repair the B-1b Lancer. Not nuke carrying capable right now, but in 24hrs they can convert the whole fleet back to being able to carry nukes. :P

Bombs in general, information & such is interesting to me at the moment, My husband is going through EOD school here at Eglin AFB. For those of you who do not know what EOD is, it is Explosive Ordinance Disposal. Them guys who disarm those roadside bombs, IEDs and all that sort of stuff.

So I get to hear about the various things he can tell me, without breaking the rules. Interesting to say the very least!

Avi, maybe one of your folks who do articles or yourself could do one specifically on our EOD troops?

___  
Blogger Stickmaker said...

My favorite "Oops..." was during the early days of the hydrogen bomb, when they were massive devices.

A bomber parked on the apron at an Air Force base in Alaska was undergoing some minor maintenance when a short released the shackles on a fusion device.

The bomb crashed through the bomb bay doors and partially embedded itself in the tarmac. Making recovery a bit difficult. They knew where it was, but how do you pry a multi-tonne hydrogen bomb out of the pavement? (Very carefully. :-)

I have a short article on fission and fusion weapons here:

http://www.dcr.net/~stickmak/JOHT/joht17bang.htm

___  
Blogger regdar said...

At first I was thinking::
"Ha, I'll just live up in the space station......"
But noooooooo..... Than I read the other article about one-in-a-million collisions. Now I'm not so much thinking as building an underground facility to survive.

___  

Post a Comment

<< Home


SF ART & BOOK REVIEWS:
Don't miss: The Ultimate Guide to SF&F Writers!
Fiction Reviews: Alastair Reynolds "Chasm City"
Short Fiction Reviews: Lovecraft's "At the Mountains of Madness" (with pics)
New Fiction Reviews: The Surreal Office

MORE RECENT POSTS:


Spectacular Steampunk Art Update

Part 2 of this eye-popping, mind-boggling series


Anything for the Perfect Shot! - Part 3

Photographers can be crazy, with a good reason


Charmed by the Unknown Brazil

Incredibly colorful festival Boi-Bumba! and more


Ekranoplans Showcase, Part 2

Mind-boggling, unique concepts


Riot Vehicle with Water Cannon (used in Colombia)

A detailed look at the newest SWAT truck


Thrilling Vintage Movie Posters

Spewed from Intergalactic Space!..


Cheers to Beers!

A selection of world's beers that simply boggle the mind


World's Most Interesting Bridges, Part 3

Awe-inspiring Construction of Mountain Bridges in China, and more


Mesmerizing Kinetic Sculptures

Living independent from their creators?


Real Life Spy Gadgets - For the secret agent in all of us

Ignorance is bliss... no more


Cable Blues: Tangled & Crazy Wiring

Second Law of Thermodynamics Wins


Underground Cities and Bunkers: Living Down Below

Deep calls to deep...


Extraordinary Clocks and Watches

"Time does not exist. Clocks exist."


The Pasta Monster (and Other Strange Food Art)

Don't stare at your food, or it will stare back


How Morgan Cars Are Made: By Hand, Out of Wood

Doing what they do best, refusing to change...


Abandoned Boeing 747 Restaurant
(& Other Plane Conversions)


A plane with unique history, haunted by kitchen smells


Surprised Astronauts
(Funny Pics)


"My God, it's full of stars!"


One-Track Wonders: Early Monorails

Past, Present and Retro-future


Komodo Dragons: They Eat Meat

Marauding Dragons on a Desolate Island


Spring Cleaning of the Mind: Surreal Art Update

Visual kick included


People Are Strange (Crazy Faces, Part 5)

Throw the switch, Igor!..


Wonder Weapons of World War Two

Made in Germany, 1940-1945


Narrow Buildings in Japan and Around the World

Skinny living can be... fascinating


The Cutting Edge of Retro Tech

They will be renaming HiFi to HyFy, starting April 1st


Bladerunner Tokyo (in Large-Format Photography)

The future began a long time ago in Tokyo...


Nightmare Playgrounds, Part 3

More entertaining than creepy? I'd say both


Victorian Flea Circuses: A Lost Art Form

Death-defying acts of flea heroism!


Strangest Music Scores, Part 2

It's a mad, mad, mad music!


Monstrous Aviation, Part 2: Huge Helicopters!

"Let's see how insanely huge we can make them!"

MORE OF THE RECENT POSTS:








Sculptural Weirdness
One-in-a-Million Collisions
Walls of Death
Apocalyptic Experiments
Cosmic Motors
Train Wrecks!
Phantasmagorical Art
Abandoned Substations
Mysterious Mima Mounds
Strange Theme Parks
Architecture of the Third Reich
Three Dimensional Fractals
Medieval Armor
Crazy Covered Cars
Painted Castles
Chrome-Delicious Robot Art
Awesome Octopi
Weirdest Accidents, Part 5
Architectural Horrors (Series)
Huggable Primates
Most Powerful Supercomputers
Curious Ephemera, Part 2
You Used It For WHAT??
Steam-Powered Tractors
Abandoned Amusement Parks
New Horrors in Construction
What Kids Wish For
Weird "Walking" Frogfish
- many more in the Archives and in the Contents Index (left bar)


FULL ARCHIVES (with previews, fast loading):

May 2009 -- April 2009 -- March 2009 --
February 2009 -- January 2009 -- December 2008 --
November 2008 -- October 2008 -- September 2008
August 2008 -- July 2008 -- June 2008
May 2008 -- April 2008 -- March 2008
February 2008 -- January 2008 -- Dec, 2007
November 2007 -- October 2007 -- Sept, 2007
August 2007 -- July 2007 -- June 2007
May 2007 -- April 2007 -- March 2007
February 2007 -- January 2007 -- Dec, 2006
November 2006 -- October 2006 -- Link Lattes




CATEGORIES:
airplanes | animals | architecture | art | auto | boats | books | cool ads | funny pics | famous | futurism | food
gadgets | health | history | humour | japan | internet | link latte | military | music | nature | photo | russia | steampunk
sci-fi & fantasy | signs | space | sports | technology | trains | travel | vintage | weird



Discretion Advised! These cartoons contain some extreme animated violence!






Airplanes
Animals
Architecture
Art
Auto
Boats
Computers
Cool Ads
Extreme Weather
Food
Funny Pics
Futurism
Gadgets
History
Humour
Link Latte
Military
Music
Nature
Oops Accidents
Photography
Robots
Science
Science Fiction

Space
Sports
Technology
Trains
Travel
UE Abandoned
Vintage
Weird

Play DRB Games!





Avi Abrams
Rachel Abrams
M. Christian
James Golbey
Simon Rose
Paul Schilperoord
Scott Seegert
Constantine vonHoffman
Steve Levenstein

- Join Our Team -
Guidelines






  • Is anyone else terrified at the thought of all of our deserts covered in solar panels? Although the areas are not productive for humans, they are an important ecosystem and we should not assume that it's useless land we can manipulate in any way without harming it!

    But yay green energy!
    Read more

  • I'm a sevillian and I think the Solucar plant is a great idea. We have more than 300 sunny days in the year and someone has done something with all that sun :D
    Read more

  • There is an interesting concept of building a 'subsurface-lake power station' in the North Sea off the Dutch coast. More info here.
    Read more

  • Great images, but I'm confused as to why you placed a nuclear power plant under the "bad" energy sources -- nuclear power is one of the better choices; you get more bang for your buck, and it's far cleaner than coal (which puts out more radiation than nuclear). New pebble bed reactors make a meltdown literally impossible.
    Read more

  • We sould support and make people support green enery immediately. We are about to cross the critical point that we can't go back.
    Read more

  • Gadren... will have to give nuclear energy it's own article one day.

    Thanks your comments, guys
    That sub-surface lake is interesting...
    Read more

  • Check out this US Carbon Footprint Map, an interactive United States Carbon Footprint Map, illustrating Greenest States. This site has all sorts of stats on individual State energy consumptions, demographics and State energy offices, State Taxes and more...

    http://www.eredux.com/states/
    Read more

  • A bit more about the Solar Tower project in Australia. It is quite different to the other examples given, in that it has no mirrors and heating of water to steam.

    It relies on a large green-house-like heating area to heat air that then flows inwards, past wind turbines and up a 1km-tall chimney (the tower).

    See this summary and this CNN story
    Read more

  • Rob Roy - many thanks for this link. This will appear in our next Energy post.
    Read more

  • This posting is awesome! I did not know that so many other non traditional ways of alternate energy have been explored ..

    Creating Wealth via Stocks
    Read more

  • wonderful work... never knew that so much initiative s been taken! the solar mirror panel thing is wow!
    Read more

  • There's a big difference between tidal and wave power.

    All your pictures show tidal systems NOT wave systems.

    Tidal would seem to be the far better bet because it is totally predictable and doesn't require some kind of reciprocating device to make it work: A conventional axial turbine is perfect
    Read more

  • The panels used with the solar tower are not photovoltaic solar collectors, they are simply steel reflectors mounted on motors which rotate them to follow the sun (heliostatic). The cost of 600 PV panels of THAT size would be pretty damn high, and the idea is to reflect sunlight, not absorb it.
    Read more

  • I dont see anything artistic in spencer tunick's works..
    Read more

  • From one of the pixels,
    As a pixel in Spencer's work many times now I can say Spencer is very much trying to show the humanity of the models, though not the individuality-except in his portraits of individuals.
    To read accounts by those of us who pose, to see more of Spencer's work, including some of his lesser known individual portraits, come to http://www.spencertunickforum.org

    Roger
    Read more

  • I'm impressed. I work for a photography company, and you know how much of a pain in the butt it is to get a class of high school seniors to form something as simple as a 0 or a 7?
    Read more

  • No kidding... I have the same problem trying to line up two of my little boys.
    Read more

  • Of course, if we're talking flip cards, there's always the classic Caltech Rose Bowl Prank.

    Incidentally, I highly recommend the book Legends of Caltech and its sequel More Legends of Caltech. Utterly chock-full of various pranks, as well as an apparent guide to those scriptwriters who created Real Genius.

    Though I have to say that the ones a particular friend of the family was involved in were not written up, probably because nobody would break silence, and so there must be many more pranks which have never made it into print.
    Read more

  • Check this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X76ZIGQgBWg

    Another amazing coordinated koreans.
    Read more

  • Air Force Photo: The other side of the story: On a hot Sat (our day off) we were told to put on white T shirts and fall out. We were marched to the drill field and told were to stand...and that is all. Some guy in a tower took our photos. Some time later these photos were for sale in the BX. Where we told anything...NO, did we get any free photos...NO were we even thanked...of course not we were all Pvt's. Pvt James R. Garrity, Sq BN 4, Fl 2100, Lackland AFB, Tex...some 61 years ago...of ya it was very hot out
    Read more

  • If you like this you should realy see this Dutch commercial! Check: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5Uw7zLeacc
    Read more

  • Mystery animal #1 is a porcupine. Not sure about the other two!
    Read more

  • The first one is indeed a porcupine, the second is a Cantor’s giant softshell turtle (Pelochelys cantorii), the third is a newborn rhino.
    Read more

  • You guys know that the picture of the elephant in the waterfall is really from the "Jungle Cruise" at DisneyLand. It's not real.
    Read more

  • 2 guesses as to the mystery animals:

    giant soft shell turtle, or terrapin?

    baby black rhino
    Read more

  • I knew I recognized that elephant from somewhere!
    Read more

  • The rhino baby is a Sumatran, not a black.
    Read more

  • the third is a sumatran rhino!!!
    Read more

  • Mystery animal #2 )))
    Read more

  • see the pic with a cat licking a mouse? look at the shadow of the mouse. now look at the shadow of the cat :)
    Read more

  • ...fails to mention the possible adverse effects that such high-powered installations can have on weather and atmospheric patterns.

    Perhaps because there really aren't any: "The intensity of the HF signal in the ionosphere is less than 3 microwatts per cm2, tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natural electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth and hundreds of times less than even the normal random variations in intensity of the Sun's natural ultraviolet (UV) energy which creates the ionosphere."

    And the total power is 3.6MW; at least two radio transmitters have been 2.5MW, and commercial radio in the US, on the high end, can exceed 100KW.

    Given the aggregate of the radio output worldwide, I wouldn't worry about one 3.6MW array hurting the environment - they don't mention it on the website because there's no reason to believe it does so in any way.
    Read more

  • Great info, Sigivald...
    Thank you.
    Read more

  • That first picture looks like it comes straight out of a Myst game.p
    Read more

  • The Goofy sticking-out-tongue emoticon above was completely unintentional ;-0
    Read more

  • It's the damn C&C Tesla Coils all over again! Yargh!
    Read more

  • "discussing it's possible use as a nefarious weapon"

    its.
    Read more

  • These are amazing! The only gripe I have is that you appear to have caught the disease that makes people, when they're sharing superb photos, feel that viewers will click out if there aren't some "funny" captions.

    Trust me, you don't need "funny" captions!
    Read more

  • See the Russian site in Google Earth. Use this co-ordinate:
    55°55'25.66"N
    36°49'8.99"E
    Read more

  • Wow Jim

    this is impressive. Nothing escapes all-seeing eye.
    Read more

  • You know, that picture of Tesla sitting in the middle of the room with all the electricity surrounding him is a double exposure. Nobody would survive something like that.

    And that giant Tesla Coil near the bottom was going to power the entire world, until Tesla ran out of funds for complicated reasons. (Partly due to the fact that they thought he was mad.) He swore to his dying day that it would've worked. He turned it on just before it was destroyed despite the fact that it was incomplete and it created an aurora in the sky. Makes you wonder...
    Read more

  • Actually theres nothing particularly dangerous about high voltages - the spark that happens occasionally when you touch a car or doorhandle an be in excess of 30,000 volts. As my electronics teacher used to say, "Its the Volts that make your hair stand on end, but its the Amps that kill you" Mr. Tesla would have been quite save so long as the amperage was low enough. The sparks are spectacular but mostly harmless. Better to worry about the carcinogenic ozone given off.
    Read more

  • Found it on Google maps:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?om=1&ll=55.924195,36.819756&spn=0.008704,0.007575&t=k&z=18
    Read more

  • I always thought electronic plants where creepy .... but nw i know i'm not the only one

    XD
    Read more

  • It sounds like you are probably using the Google custom domains feature. I had a lot of problems with this trying to move my site about six months ago, but I did it again recently and it was a piece of cake. I'll adjust my link to your site with the new URL. Thanks again for all of the great posts!
    Read more

  • Yes this was quite a smooth transition. So far so good.
    Read more

  • Love the "life's too short for the wrong job" ads! So well crafted.
    Read more

  • "Ad for paints, quite impossible to pass by" is actually a Nationwide Insurance ad.

    Like "get insurance before a billboard of a huge can of paint suddenly becomes REAL and tips over and spills on your building and cars".. sort of.
    Read more

  • I link you
    Read more


Send us your topic ideas, site suggestions, rants or sweet unpublished poetry. We love to hear from you.



Misc.:
Data Recovery
File Recovery
The Weight Loss Forum
Online Forex
Online Backgammon
Maritime news










Blu