-
I'm annoyed that the clearly superior side is labeled 'B' as thought it should come after 'A' in consideration. The janitor at my place of work also uses this obnoxious 'over the back' configuration, despite the many notes I have left him to rectify the situation.
Read more
-
true. configuration A isn't just unergonomic but more complicated to use as well.
considering that there are some TP-holding constructions with a lid on top to help in tearing individual pieces off, configuration A is clearly not the one to prefer.
i would guess they are watchin a particulary painful stunt.
the reason i'm thinking this is because i recognise the faces.
on the left the half face belongs to "Steve-O", the doggy i dont know, the guy with the missing tooth is Ehren McGhehey, the one in the lower right is Dave England and the quarter face behind Dave is Loomis Fall.
so i guess someone is breaking his own bones, slamming hard on the ground or doing some other pretty painful thing. =)
Read more
-
I'm definitly a B-sider.
the sheet is easier to find...AND you only touch the sheets you need.
Read more
-
I prefer neither A nor B but instead to keep the roll off the holder altogether. Is that C or off the alphabet altogether?
Read more
-
I never left a comment, but I f*ing love this site !!!!
please continue !
a french guy.
Read more
-
B may appear more handy but usually when you try to tear the paper you either:
a) rip apart the sheet, leaving fragments on the lid.
b) doesn´t rip well, tube rolls and you end with more paper on your hands than you need.
A is superior because it prevents unwanted rolling and it helps you to rip the sheet properly.
Read more
-
This site is Awesome I havitsaved as a Favorte, and stuble acros it on my searc nd end up spendin hours Here !
keep up the good work and don't use a wirelss keyboard as typos happen alot.
the Wykeman
Read more
-
If anybody knew anything about anything, they would surely see the vast difference in sanitary properties of each choice. B is superior. Be keeps the paper away from touching the wall ( which is of questionable cleanliness). If you need proof that B is superior, make note that in better hotels, the roll is in the B position, and the first sheet neatly folded into a point.
The roll at all times should not touch any surface, so it stays sanitary. This would also insinuate, that any cat playtime with said roll would be a definite breach in sanitary condition....
Read more
-
"note that in better hotels, the roll is in the B position"
This is true, I worked at hotel and we had to place them in the B position. Most places I've worked which had public toilets also insist on the B position.
You don't want to know what happens if you put it in a A position in a public toilet... Some people have no coordination when wiping their behind.
Read more
-
Very cool - liked the time lapse of the Sun.
Read more
-
Don't forget Jeff de Boer's amazing armor for cats and mice:
http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2006/12/animal-armor-new-art-form.html?showComment=1167414420000
Read more
-
I need a new mask...
Read more
-
For the history minded, the longbow didn't do much against the French except goad them into a fight. The armor clad infantry were killed the old fashioned way: spears and clubs.
Read more
-
true. it wasn't the longbows that killed them. the terrain played a huge part in that conflict. First, there was a bottleneck in the terrain, so the French knights weren't able to gain from their advantage in numbers. Second, the area became very muddy, thus, the armor not only slowed the knights down, but the sheer weight prevented those that went down/slipped from standing up. In contrast, the lightly armored Englishmen had better mobility and were able to cut down the (horribly) advancing French knights.
Read more
-
"T'is but a flesh wound!"
Read more
-
Henry VIII, eat your
heart out.
Read more
-
chain mail did not make a difference, they did not carry you off they battlefield on a stretcher in the middle agess. what a muppet.
Read more
-
@anonymoous:
>chain mail did not make a difference, they did not carry you off they battlefield on a stretcher in the middle agess. what a muppet.
Of course. They just left their friends and brothers to die in the mud and the cold. Friendship and comraderie hadn't been invented yet, you know, in those days.
/irony //just to be sure
Read more
-
Read more
-
Just wanted to say wow, what a great article! I am a medieval buff but never looked at the history of armor.
Can not wait to share this with my friends.
Sari
theviewfromsarisworld.blogspot.com
Read more
-
There's nothing medieval at all about the first one with the face and eye-grills, and there are a large number of copies/fakes/fantasy in there but you've got lots of great originals too.
Read more
-
But as weapons got more sophisticated during this Middle Ages arms race, smiths had to keep up, making their suits stronger, lighter, and more flexible until they'd reached the pinnacle of defense as well as offense
Well, not so much. Suits got heavier as firearms came into popularity, until they were too heavy to be useful and still stop a bullet.
(Thus "bullet proof", from being tested (proofed) by being shot, and successfully stopping the bullet.)
Lighter armor is great against a thrusting weapon, assuming it can still stop it - but against a mass weapon or heavy impacts, heavier armor is more protective, as the mass of the armor will absorb impact.
(This is observed by modern re-enactors; one can use titanium armor to reduce weight, but it doesn't absorb impact force very well.)
Read more
-
Several photos here I've never seen before. I wasn't aware that Europeans ever created helmets made to emulate an actual face, but it seems they did. Interesting.
Read more
-
If anyone is ever in NYC go to the metropolitan museum of art. they have an amazing collection of armor including full suits of armor for horses
Read more
-
Early in the Hundred Year's War, longbows could easily take out a knight - provided he was within penetration range. At the beginning, this was anywhere from 50 to 200 yards, but towards the end of the war some armour became so heavy and strong that it was almost impossible to penetrate (aside from some weak sections such as the thin armour near the eye holes).
The French knights got scrooged over mostly because they were riding horses which had nowhere near enough armour to protect them from an arrow, especially not the incredibly damaging broadhead arrows which longbowmen carried especially for killing horses.
The horses would get hit, fall over. The knights, if they were lucky, would land safely and get on with the moving - but more often the knight would be hurt by the fall (he is in heavy, restrictive armour, after all).
Read more
-
The longbow, it gets so much love that it seems many people have forgotten that the English actually LOST the 100 years war and that means the French WON the war. Unbelievable? believe it ;)
Read more
-
What a great reference page, thanks for posting it!
Meanwhile, Jesper is right - a longbowman could really mess up an armor'd knight's (er) day, regardless of terrain and weather.
When folks such as Anon & raul talk about terrain acting as an advantage for longbowmen, they're usually thinking of Agincourt. True, the terrain at Agincourt was an undeniable advantage in that encounter, but it was by no means the only battle decided by longbows. Ask Harold of England in 1066... :)
Read more
-
William the Conquerer did not use longbows and except for an arrow in Harolds Eye did not decide the outcome (he was wounded by the arrow but killed by Norman knights). The first major use of massed longbow fire was at the battle of Flakirk, which so impressed the English King with the slaughter of the lightly armoured scottish clansmen that they became a large section of every English Army ever since.
There were nearly 10,000 English archers at Agincourt, if they each fired off 25 which is 1 quiver each thats a quarter of a million arrows.
Around 10,000 French were killed. I group which is dedicated to the study and reenactment of this battle told me that more french drowned in the mud after wounds than were killed by arrows and that the English Infantry slaughtered the majority of the rest.
Direct fire from Longbows is nasty but most english armies used showers of arrows which are much less effective against armor except against cavalry as it is almost impossible to give a horse the same protection as a man.
Read more
-
Thank you for insightful comments, read with interest
Read more
-
Am I the only on e who noticed that someone has written an article on ARMOUR and can't spell it.
Read more
-
"Armor" is the Americal spelling. "Armour" is the British spelling.
Read more
-
Read more
-
What Lenin would think? He'd approve seeing as he himself had a Rolls Royce. Which proves that some will always be more equal than others.
Read more
-
India had to be involed, inspred post as usual,
Read more
-
Those were DUPLO blocks not LEGO but close
Read more
-
There's a pic of a white gold plated Mercedes floating around google images...
Read more
-
The writer is a buttnose for referring to the "ugliness" of that wooden car. It's always beautiful to see the realization of a person's vision, especially if you can appreciate it in its own right, instead of comparing it to something else.
Read more
-
This are some of the coolest cars ever.
"Fred Smilek is the acting president of the Society to Save Endangered Species. It was founded two years ago by Fred Smilek along with his two best friends Charles and Jonathan. http://www.fredjsmilek.com"
Read more
-
nice buddy...... it's an excellent collection of latest cars and i have got many of the my favourite cars wallpapers from ur site but as u know there is always room for the betterment as no body is cent percent perfect
Read more
-
Hey, I'm the Paula Wirth mentioned above... Although I took the photo of the lego car, I am not the owner or artist of the car... but they must be very cool, indeed.
Read more
-
This is fantastic!
DRB has been my absolute favorite and most recommended site for quite some time, but this gem of a list has made my day, no, my month!
Thanks for yet another amazing resource.
There are many of us that cherish what you guys do here.
Read more
-
Great stuff!
The amount of work that's gone into this must be absolutely immense.
Thanks for posting this and putting in the hours, now if you could get another one started on the world's classic novels, that would be great!
;)
Read more
-
What an awesome labour of love.
Read more
-
Absolutely marvellous!
I've felt that I'm simply overwhelmed by the sheer amount of authors these days, and lately taken refuge among classic litterature. This little wonder might just help me on my way getting into contemporary stuff once again.
Read more
-
Wow! Absolutely amazing.
"epic" indeed
Read more
-
Is there a way to actually download and edit this spreadsheet? I would love to have something like this for my own use.
Read more
-
Thank you for encouragement, it's great to get some input.
Enusan - this is a working copy for now, something that we will be perfecting, so it's not for wide distribution yet.
Stay tuned for more sci-fi-delicious updates!
Read more
-
You are my heroe(s).
Really
Read more
-
Great work !
I was too lazy to search myself for new writers to discover.
It seems you did the job for me, thanks a lot !
Read more
-
The Robert Reed link goes to the Brady Bunch actor, not the writer.
This is a great effort. Thanks Avi.
Read more
-
A fantastic resource, I can only offer a hearty thank you to all involved in it's creation and say that is will be used an awful lot in our home
Thanks
Read more
-
This is a great list! Why don't you offer it as a download so everyone can keep his own notes or filter it to his liking?
Read more
-
Awesome. Thank you.
Read more
-
Pretty Awesome. Only problem I can see is I'll never have time for anything but reading. Good thing I have a pretty non-demanding job.
Read more
-
This is incredible!
Thank you so much for sharing it!
Read more
-
Thank you guys, really appreciated.
Also, if anyone wants to help out with writing fiction reviews on SF DRB site, let me know by email.
Happy reading!
Read more
-
Avi, you create what the Web should be about: "the increase and diffusion of knowledge and wisdom, and their delights, among all people."
Right On, Man!
Read more
-
I have to point out that I read my first Vance Aandhal story in F&SF in 1964 or 1965. If I recall correctly, it was "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomed"(from a Whitman poem). He pretty much disappeared not long after that.
Read more
-
Excellent guide, love the notes, discovered some new (for me) great authors.
Read more
-
I would love to see pics of the artists on scaffolding spray painting the Kelburn Castle.
Read more
-
on the one hand, it's not right that they're doing this to historic structures like that... but on the other hand...it's freakin awesome!
Read more
-
"painted over by Brazillian street artists from Sao Paolo, Nina and Nunca Os Gemeos (completed in June 2007)"
Minor correction here...Nunca and Os Gemeos are 3 different people, Gemeos just always paint as a pair. Awesome story though..might have missed this otherwise
Read more
-
Great artist with beautiful art castles.
Read more
-
from stately castle to garbage in a few easy steps
Read more
-
And the Brazilian town is "São Paulo", or, if you may, "Sao Paulo". Paolo is an Italian name, not Portuguese.
Take care!
Read more
-
Very nice castles turned to colourful piece of sh..t !
Read more
-
Stone monolith > Tremendous work of human creativity? I don't think so
Read more
-
A much more "Authentic" experience would include having the street "Artists" SHOOT at any disapproving spectators! Looks great now, but the paint will probably wash off soon, in that rainy Scottish weather!
Read more
-
OMG, that's tragic. Surely there was an abandoned strip mall or another already worthless bit of property they could have destroyed instead.
Read more
-
The paintings looks great but historic buildings shouldnt be used for such.
Read more
-
reminds me of a castle i visited in portugal.
Read more
-
really stupid. hey - lets go graffitti up the pyramids, or the taj mahal, or other historical buildings, monuments.
And I am saying this as an artist.
I so agree with Zajac - it is a colorful piece of &&&&**^
Historical places should not be 'raped' by such things. Historical places should be preserved and treasured.
Graffiti should be left for the bus terminals, abandoned buildings, or designated fences and other projects, where it doesn't ruin the landscape and cover up beauty.
Read more
-
The "Mystery experiment" appears to be an archer attempting to shoot a balloon held in the mouth of the volunteer. In the photo, he appears to have aimed a little high, and just missed
Read more
-
The picture of the orange soap opera seems to originate from http://weem.deviantart.com/art/Malaise-de-L-Orange-15973382
Read more
-
The fruit infidelity pics are from
'Malaise de L'Orange',
here.
Read more
-
Mystery Photo:
President Barrack Obama being hazed his first week in office.
Read more
-
Is it just me, or does the experimental subject resemble the President? Perhaps it was a special transition toughening exercise?
Read more
-
A caption for that archery photo could be "Dude, you almost shot Brad Pitt".
Cause for some reason it looks like him.
Read more
-
It´s really fantastic. Very, very nice.
Read more
-
Lovely stuff. I must try it myself.
I think you'll find the "riveted, highly evocative face" is actually spot welded.
Smerky
Read more
-
Behold the Beaviance!
Recently posted on Dr. Grordbort's Rayguns Fan Art Forum:
http://www.wetanz-forums.com/viewtopic.php?t=1370
March march march Zzzap!
Read more
-
Great Series!
But no serious round of contemporary retro robots would be complete without the work of Clayton Bailey. He's been making these for 35 years!
http://www.claytonbailey.com/index.htm
Read more
-
For more cephalopod video, check out the second half of
this TED talk. The first half is good too.
Read more
-
Wow. Camoflouge is the coolest. I can't believe how quickly it went from looking like a rock covered in algae to it's true self!
www.wannasmile.com
Read more
-
i pot coy octopi
Read more
-
As soon as I opened this post, I started thinking back to that Magnapinna video. Truly one of the most unearthly things I've ever seen.
Read more
-
Octopus is a Greek word meaning 8 feet. As it is Greek, it shouldn't be written as Octopi. Only Latin words take 'i' for their plural. We should say octopuses, in the same way we should say platypuses, not platypi. :P
Read more
-
oooh I love that vampire squid that can turn itself inside out
Read more
-
the collosal squid doesnt just have hooked teeth, each one of those teeth can rotate 360 degrees! yes they are all free floating teeth!
Read more
-
The vampire squid has such facinating eyes, they almost look like cool blue stones set into its head like gems on a crown.
Read more
-
true... wonderful observation
Read more
-
i pot coy octopi.
Read more
10 Comments:
The mechanical fractals are scary fascinating.
The last one reminded me of those MC Escher prints. Imagine combining Escher & fractals- whoa!
Great blog
Talking aboute mechanical fractals: the Vasconcelos library in Mexico:
picture
these things hurt my brain. ow.
It's awesome and futuristic. Great stuff.
What you expect the future to look like. It's great.
Actually the first one in the Groovy Fractals by Professor Enigma set made me think of the inside of the Way from one of Greg Bear's "Eternity" books.
Awesome!
Great looking images, a look at what could be and my be in the future. Cool!
Post a Comment
<< Home