-
VERY cool! I hate graffiti when it's just a way of pissing on a wall to mark territory but when it's art it's amazing. So glad you included the fun folks of Graffiti Research Labs.
Read more
-
- and then there's this brilliant idea: graffiti as interactive storytelling: http://tinyurl.com/27xw98
Read more
-
I love Banksy! He had a secret art showcase in Los Angeles last year, too. Awesome artist/activist.
Read more
-
cool
Read more
-
M.Christian - interesting interactive idea, thanks...
Read more
-
More street art from melbourne, australia.
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/02/street-art-pt3.html
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/02/street-art-pt2.html
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/02/street-art.html
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/01/more-megs.html
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/01/graf-pics.html
http://davowade.blogspot.com/2007/01/train-monkey.html
Read more
-
Thanks Dave!
Definitely good material!
Read more
-
Read more
-
Read more
-
Read more
-
These are great. I noticed a lot of fun and artistic graffiti when I studied abroad in Lausanne, Switzerland. I don't have all of my favorites online yet, but here are some good ones:
http://picasaweb.google.com/nora.mcdaniel/Graffiti/photo#5190169559015112306
(on a the back of a podium at our technical school)
http://picasaweb.google.com/nora.mcdaniel/Graffiti/photo#5190166410804083714
I found this one around town. The writer wrote "you wish"...
http://picasaweb.google.com/nora.mcdaniel/Graffiti/photo#5190166410804083714
This was on the inside of a bathroom door at school. It says "my height," "my nose," and "my mouth."
Read more
-
And this is some more about Light Graffiti... as well as my own attempts..
http://www.thednalife.com/2008/09/light-graffiti-is-fun.html
You can also see other art we find interesting on our blog.
Read more
-
http://www.ekosystem.org/
check that out,
Its got the most AMAZING graffiti posts
i mean it
Im a graffiti artist here in Sao Paulo, brasil
Iv been all over,
but nothing compares to the art we have here
so check out the Sao Paulo section
With love,
Elly.
Read more
-
"This is definitely staged"
Really? No shit.
Read more
-
I live in/near Cincinnati & have been dying to explore the subway!
Read more
-
Go and explore the subway then.
Read more
-
OK I call hoax on that Calgary abandoned subway pic. I lived there during the 70s and early 80s during LRT construction (C-Train) and although there is one short underground portion soth of downtown (Cemetery Hill), there were never any tunnels built under the downtown area, all the lines were planned from the outset to run along the 7th avenue Transit Mall.
I have a hard time figuring out where in Calgary that alleged photo is from, there are no obvious identifying landmarks. Source?
Read more
-
there are no photos... but local explorers keep speaking about that. The information is suppressed for obvious reasons.
Read more
-
The information about Calgary's tunnel under downtown can be found in the book "Calgary- Secrets of the City". I would list author and publisher but alas my books are packed at the moment
Read more
-
Stampede city gal..... I have lived here all my 32 years and in fact the tunnels do exist. If you go to the alderman's level of city hall parkade, there is a steel ladder. This descends to below the parkade, where the ORIGINAL plans for part of 7th ave c-train lines run. You can do a search and find them. There has been some hoopla about what to do with this vast amount of opens space built below the existing lines. There have even been suggestions in the Calgary herald about using it as part of the Downtown Public library!
If you have ever ridden the c-train just as you leave the Victoria park train station and head into downtown it is a very short, but completely underground section(before the cemetery which is south of the Erlton station) As you are surfacing, you can plainly see where the tunnel was suppose to branch into two, where it would connect UNDER city hall, not go around it as it does now.
look into it....
Read more
-
Undernead the city of antwerp in Belguim are also kilometers of subway that arent in use.
Read more
-
Here's a very cool documentary about abandoned spaces:
http://www.amazon.com/Echoes-Forgotten-Places/dp/B000EBDHIW/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1214615674&sr=8-1
Read more
-
Good article - had the privilege of seeing a few of these places.
It's hard to qualify the Cincinnati tunnels - they're simply just an abandoned platform with some tunnel stubs - not in the league of GCans!
I tender one of the most amazing, the Niagara Falls tunnels ['confluence']
http://quantum-x.ice.org/episodes/niagara-falls-power-station-confluence-tunnels/
NY's abandonned subways legs also rate a mention
http://sleepycity.net/photo/785/
Read more
-
Thank you for these links... by the way the last link's not working.
Read more
-
Cool, I was there in Balaklava, it's open for visitors, I took about the same pictures :)
Read more
-
This looks so much like Half-Life 2
Read more
-
I love this site, London underground lost stations would make a great addition to this list. Some stations can be glimpsed whilst travelling in on the central line [they still have the original posters etc when they were sealed up from above]
Fans of all your posts
The Wykeman
Read more
-
This is were you see the mother of all abandoned tunnels:
http://berliner-unterwelten.de/
Read more
-
I had seen those shadow sculptures about a month ago and decided to try and achieve one myself. I created the shadow of a cat. There is a picture located here: http://nicolerae365.blogspot.com/2007/07/shadow-art.html
Please tell me what you think!
Read more
-
Elliot, nice kitty there.
must be hard to set up these things...
Read more
-
No matter how hard I try, I can't see that girl spinning clockwise, but I think it's actually a mental map problem in my case. You see, I know how to dance, so the only logical way to spin is with the leg trailing, so my brain automatically rejects the alternate interpretation.
The Ferris Wheel right after it works fine, but the green dot doesn't get to eat all the magenta ones— tricksy little guys keep popping back up.
Read more
-
Try to concentrate on the tip of her shoe (the one closest to the ground), then blink and shift your gaze - seems to work for me.
Read more
-
I also can't see the spinning girl change direction, not matter how hard I try. The ferris wheel is impressive though.
Read more
-
B. Durbin,
Whether she is spinning clockwise or counter-clockwise, the leg is still trailing. Blows my mind.
-Hal
Read more
-
whats the hidden image in the poison ad? and how am i meant to see it?
Read more
-
Hi Princess... it's a skull. Really scary, actually.
Read more
-
the 2 cubes aint the same colour, open it in paint and join them together and you'll see
Read more
-
Paul: true, but the "lighter" cube is actually darker!
Read more
-
its indeed cheaper to recover any lost data in Africa than in the west send your damaged Drives,Corrupt RAID Servers to East African Data Handlers, ITS CHEAPER TO RECOVER YOU ALL YOUR LOST DATA!
Read more
-
B.Durbin it sounds like the problem is that you are looking at it as the same leg. Don't think of it as one leg either trailing or leading, rather think of it as the right leg trailing for it to spin in one direction, then think of it as the left leg trailing and it will spin in the other direction.
Read more
-
The trick with the spinning girl is to concentrate on the shadow of her toes on the leading foot.If you catch it just as it comes into view on the left side, she reverses direction...then on the right side, she reverses direction again. Quite an amazing little illusion.
Thanks, Stephen B.
Read more
-
Oh my. After staring at the spinning girl for about 15 minutes, I was able to make her switch directions whenever I wanted 'her' to. The downside is, I now have a bad headache.
Read more
-
Very interesting photos, thanks.
One minor error: it's "Lucas, Kansas"
Not Texas (unless Lucas, TX put up a sign outside of town that says Kansas) :)
Read more
-
The second "Nameless" wonder is M-505 Adams Brothers Probe 16 made in 1969. It was used as a Durango 95, a stolen sport car, in Staley Kubrick's "Clockwork Orange" movie.
Read more
-
Why does Dave Major keep ruining perfectly good Isettas?
I suspect the black, unidentified propeller car is heavily modified, but it looks more like a Tatra than anything else, especially in the rear of the greenhouse.
Read more
-
jAzzndre, thanks!.. see update
Read more
-
Hi, first nameless is a young german company called jetcar (http://www.jetcar.de/).
Read more
-
This one you posted is clearly photoshopped. Looks like a worth1000 entry
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/229/481011073_f68608532f.jpg
Read more
-
Sigivald is absolutely right. The black unidentified propeller car is indeed a Tatra 77 from the middle 1930's. It was a car with a rear air-cooled V8 engine, but with a not-so-good performance, capable only of 100 miles per hour.
The car of the foto is not a much modified 77, except for the propeller mounting. Remember that most of the cars of that time used several bodymakers for the same model, and so, the style varied somewhat.
Read more
-
It is about time the big manufacturers bring some whimsy to their designs. Great Post.
Read more
-
I love art cars and that is why I started my own. I have a 1981 Mercedes Benz 300SD covered in close to 6000 pens. I call it Mercedes Pens and I am
The Pen Guy
-
Something you HAVE to include with part three. Do a search for the RAPOM motorcycle... TOTALLY awesome!
Read more
-
This car you can´t identify is made from TATRA 805 or maybe TATRAPLAN...that is the base for the showed tunning... the cars were producted in Czechoslovakia... in the Company Museum in the hometown (Koprivnice) of the Tatra factory is even very similar snow-car drove by a propeler and - additionaly and optionaly(in the case of very haevy terain) by a belt-track...
Read more
-
Actually, the cathedral hearse's back side is a 1959 Cadillac Eldorado
Biarritz.
Read more
-
The red Jeep Cherokee is most likely photo shopped, the Cherokee is a unibody and would not come apart like that with out a lot of work.
Read more
-
Read more
-
Then again, not all offices are stressful:
http://www.vimeo.com/173714
Read more
-
aww.. that's so cute. and they're hiring!
Read more
-
This one is the best:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKtSlWKfbHM
Read more
-
Yes!!
I updated the post.
Read more
-
What about this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeTuQDJDqdM
Read more
-
that one clip of "worst first day at work" that's from a scifi show called "dead like me" it's a rather interesting show
Read more
-
Don't forget the biggest difference between prison and your cubicle -
In prison, you never get to leave and go home. you have no freedom, no possessions, no money, and no choice in where you live or what you eat. And no one particularly cares if you are terrorized, molested, or beaten - or if you die from anything anyone does to you.
Read more
-
I think I need to go do some laundry...
Read more
-
i couldn't decide whether to laugh out loud or take a good long drink... maybe both.
Funniest blog entry in a long time!
Read more
-
there is a small addendum to that story of the 5 failed safeties (out of six) .. unfortunately i never could find independent confirmation except in the book of a very respected austrian journaillist ... but perhaps a blogger can help ..
that incident prompted the US government to start a masive research project to improve the safeties in nuclear devices .. the results of this research project were quickly incorporated in the existing bombs .. AND .. here it comes:
the results were also supposedly leaked to the government of the CCCP because of the fear that a similar accident in russia could perhaps start an accidental war ..
Read more
-
Very cool, Anonymous! Wish I had that info when I did the piece -- would have been a great addition. I, for one, am packing my beans and heading for the hills .. and that's NOT taking into account the technological 'expertise' of countries like Russia, France, Pakistan, India (shudder)
Read more
-
you are my FUD-bitch, you spread the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt and I reap the rewards of blowing more carbon with less efficiency.
Lets see a page about all the poor little children that died before we discovered polio vaccines.
How about a page about how many people die in car accidents every year oh, 40,000+ is to overwhelming for you.
Get a life and appreciate what we DO have - safe thermonuclear power, safe lands to live in from having thermonuclear warheads.
Read more
-
...that's one way to look at things
Read more
-
I do kinda hate to break it to you, but a drop, collision, or even explosion won't create the nuclear fission/fusion explosion that is the worry about nuclear weapons. The basic idea of a fission explosion is wrapping a sphere with explosives so the sphere will implode quickly enough that it will explode. Thermonuclear added more stages to create a bigger secondary explosion. But the difficultly in creating a spherical implosion is what prevents the average terrorist from making one. The Rosenburgs were executed when they passed secrets dealing with this to the Russian. That same difficulty is what prevents an accidental nuclear explosion.
Don't spread FUD. There are very legitimate fears you sort of addressed: Random weapons-grade materials and pre-made bombs missing, and the possibility of the conventional explosives spreading radioactive particles that really could cause alot of death. Plutonium has a lethal toxicity easily ranked in the parts per billion.
So there is definately legitimate concerns - just don't blow them to far out of porportion. I'd hate to see you have to get sued to pay alot of people's laundry bills.
Read more
-
The only way to set off a fission bomb is for the outer shell of conventional warheads to all detonate within a few microseconds of each other. This just wont happen in the case of a drop or some other mishap. These devices require finely tuned electronic circuits to initiate simultaneous detonation.
I like your government-bashing energy, but please use it somewhere where the government is actually at fault.
Read more
-
Great stuff! It's staggering to think about all these near-misses...
Read more
-
My dad dropped a nuclear bomb while loading it on a plane on a Turkish runway during the Vietnam War. It rolled down the runway before they caught up to it. The officer who saw it said not to tell any one, because such accidents make it all the way to the president.
Read more
-
"Luckily for the crew they managed to drop their bombs, which fell 8,000 feet, landing with a bang off the coast of British Columbia"
So that's why BC Bud grows so fast... :p
Great entry, and I don't think it's spreading of fear as much as it is sharing of information. Thank you.
Read more
-
You make a good point--accidents do happen.
But your post is alarmist. It's clear that you're trying to maximize fear. I don't think that's very responsible, and it shows a clear misunderstanding of the technologies you discuss.
The public's fear of the atom is reminiscent of the fear of electricity in the late 19th and early 20th century. Why don't you write a post about the dangers of electricity and associated accidents?
We're not going to be driving hydrogen cars tomorrow. Get used to the fact that harnessing the power of the atom is the most promising way forward /right now/.
Read more
-
I worked with one of the guys on the crew at the silo near Little Rock, AR, and he tells a bit of a different story.
Basically, someone dropped a huge wrench from the top of the silo, and as it bounced between the wall and the missile, it punctured the fuel tank. As the rocket fuel leaked out, the tank lost pressure and the rocket finally lost its support, crumpled, and exploded.
But this didn't happen suddenly. The leak took hours and hours to hit that critical drop in pressure. They evac'd the silo and everyone near it, but said nothing to the people living just miles away.
Still just as scary, though...
Read more
-
Number of accidental nuclear explosions: 0
This is like saying a society is violent and dangerous because people get angry, even if the murder rate is zero.
BTW: Bombs decay and become non fissionable over time, especially if they are banged around and older than 15 years. So the fear mongering over the one's out there isn't even founded in reality.
Read more
-
this article shows a complete lack of understanding of how nuclear warheads work, as well as a blatant misuse of the word "thermonuclear" (that only applies to fusion, not fission). It's completely inaccurate to imply that any of those had a chance of going off.
Read more
-
You couldn't be more wrong on the story about two bombs landing in waterlogged famrland. A quick internet search reveals thatwhile two weapons were lost when the plane malfunctioned, the second one is not out there going "tick tick tick". In fact, they found the impact crater the bomb made and recovered a substantial portion of the material from the bomb after digging up to 22'. Heavy rainfall forced the abandonment of the recovery and the Air Force bought the land to prevent further digging. See this link for a factual description of events, it's much than this bullshit.
http://www.ibiblio.org/bomb/hansen_doc.html
Read more
-
As JJ said, it is extremely difficult for a nuclear or thermonuclear weapon to go off accidentally. Unless every segment of the explosive shell is triggered simultaneously to create a uniform implosion wave that smoothly compresses your fissionable core to supercriticality, you're going to just get a messy conventional explosion that tosses fissionable material around. (Worst case is a fizzle where you get momentary criticality and a yield equivalent to a few tons.) Any weapon that's been sitting underwater for any length of time is going to be in much too bad a shape to have any meaningful risk of fission detonation.
This refers to implosion weapons, of course -- uranium-gun weapons are more rugged and mechanically straightforward, but they're also inefficient and have not been a part of the US arsenal for many decades.
Accidental detonation of a fusion weapon is even more vastly unlikely, since it requires a clean and efficient detonation of the fission primary to reach the temperatures necessary to initiate a fusion burn in the deuterium fuel.
Two other points: David Kraft, if only we had safe thermonuclear energy! So far the only way anyone's figured out to get more energy out a fusion reaction than you put in is a bomb, and the practical applications are limited. We've got plenty of (more or less safe) nuclear power, but no thermonuclear.
And, regarding leaking safeguard technology to the Soviets: certainly sounds plausible enough. I know that after PAL (Permissive Action Link) technology was developed in the US to prevent unauthorized launch or detonation of weapons, it was quite intentionally leaked to the Soviet Union, and to China when they began to develop their arsenal. The idea was to minimize the chance of a rogue military commander launching his weapons at the U.S. without authorization.
Read more
-
Thank you for these great comments. I've updated the article, see above.
Read more
-
Thanks to all of you great folks for your fun and/or informative comments on my little piece on nuclear weapon boo-boos. I especially appreciate the technical info that’s been put out, especially since I’m a writer and not an engineer. Avi is quite correct to place an amendment to the piece about how unlikely an actual nuclear detonation is. I also just learned (thanks Jon) that the supposedly “tick, tick, ticking” bomb that was dropped on North Carolina was recovered – though that it impacted at 700 mph doesn’t make me feel any better.
However (and didn’t you know this was coming) I still feel the spirit of the piece is still very much intact. I am not anti-government, anti-military, anti-nuclear, anti-America, or anti-much-of-anything: I just wanted to share with folks who are into odd and unusual history that there have been a considerable number of pants-staining mistakes made regarding the most dangerous device ever created.
Or, to put it in bad movie language: “I don't know what's scarier, losing a nuclear weapon or that it happens so often there's actually a term for it,” from Broken Arrow, starring the world’s favorite Scientologist, John Travolta.
In a follow-up piece I’ll be talking about something REALLY scary: screw-ups involving biological and chemical weapons.
Ciao,
M.Christian
Read more
-
Don't forget the Palomares incident..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palomares_H-Bomb_Incident
Read more
-
Wow ... as scary as the article itself is, I can't believe the sheer naivete of the comments here. The people who've said either that losing nukes is no biggie, or that nuclear power is safe, need to do more research &/or seek professional help.
Nukes are not candy. Once lost, they can easily fall into the hands of unsavoury folks ... or simply leak extremely dangerous & long-lived isotopes into the environment. Explode, no - but they can still kill.
We have yet to invent a foolproof storage system for n-waste, & I doubt any such system is even physically possible. Wind, tidal & solar are all cheap & clean alternatives. We have no excuses left for continuing to neglect them in 2007.
Go tell former residents of Chernobyl how "safe" nuclear power is - they'll be relieved to hear it - the ones not dead of cancer yet, that is. The immediate death toll from that ONE accident is unknown, but indirect deaths from carcinomas likely number in the millions.
We need to avoid use of a technology that's both deadly & obscenely expensive, while we still can.
Read more
-
jim, no one has said that losing nukes is "no biggie". Most of these are reasonable comments pointing out that fears of a nuclear explosion from dropping a warhead are unfounded.
And before you cast stones, you should get your own facts straight. Regarding Chernobyl, you say "The immediate death toll from that ONE accident is unknown, but indirect deaths from carcinomas likely number in the millions."
Rubbish. While certainly a horrible tragedy that should never have happened, the death toll is estimated to be
less than 10,000.
-
Your "glowing" test area is nothing more than a broad, largely empty desert valley with some roads and an old farm house. Of course, if you know the history of it, it really is amazing, but at first glance it is nothing much to look at.
Read more
-
I love the whiners crying "waa FUD waa". Wonder how many "terrists" would love to get their hands on one, just for the scrap inside? You FUD-monkeys would shit your panties if one was found on your block.
Cool article. Made the FUD wieners weep.
Read more
-
I loved reading all of this. My husband worked at Ellsworth with the trailers & equipment they use to load & repair the B-1b Lancer. Not nuke carrying capable right now, but in 24hrs they can convert the whole fleet back to being able to carry nukes. :P
Bombs in general, information & such is interesting to me at the moment, My husband is going through EOD school here at Eglin AFB. For those of you who do not know what EOD is, it is Explosive Ordinance Disposal. Them guys who disarm those roadside bombs, IEDs and all that sort of stuff.
So I get to hear about the various things he can tell me, without breaking the rules. Interesting to say the very least!
Avi, maybe one of your folks who do articles or yourself could do one specifically on our EOD troops?
Read more
-
My favorite "Oops..." was during the early days of the hydrogen bomb, when they were massive devices.
A bomber parked on the apron at an Air Force base in Alaska was undergoing some minor maintenance when a short released the shackles on a fusion device.
The bomb crashed through the bomb bay doors and partially embedded itself in the tarmac. Making recovery a bit difficult. They knew where it was, but how do you pry a multi-tonne hydrogen bomb out of the pavement? (Very carefully. :-)
I have a short article on fission and fusion weapons here:
http://www.dcr.net/~stickmak/JOHT/joht17bang.htm
Read more
-
At first I was thinking::
"Ha, I'll just live up in the space station......"
But noooooooo..... Than I read the other article about one-in-a-million collisions. Now I'm not so much thinking as building an underground facility to survive.
Read more
-
I backed into a bomb with a front-end loader. It fell into a ditch and we drove away...FAST lolol
PSSST: dont tell anyone
Read more
"QUANTUM SHOT" #232
|
3 Comments:
I have never seen a real panda before (does TV count?:P) but they are sooooo adorable!! Thanks for posting!
I never thought I'd say this but those are even cuter then pygmy marmosets! Are there any up for sale?
How cute!!! I never knew that pandas were so minute in size, the second photo he is only 5 inches!!!!!
Fred Smilek
Email- Fred_Smilek@yahoo.com
Webpage- http://sites.google.com/site/fredjsmilek/
Fred Smilek is the acting president of the Society to Save Endangered Species. It was founded in 2006 by Fred Smilek along with his two best friends Charles and Jonathan.
Post a Comment
<< Home