American Supersonic Airliners: Race for a Dream
|
|
"QUANTUM SHOT" #189Boeing-2707 SST - Supersonic Marvel, Largely Forgotten Today Capable of transporting 296 passengers across the ocean at 2900 km/h. - 40 years ago, in 1968. The Sixties were simply amazing times for fascinating technology development. In the automotive industry, the "American dream" of a powerful full-size car was still very much alive. In space exploration, we reached out to the Moon. In air travel, the dream of a supersonic passenger plane seemed almost certain to become reality. Witness "Boeing-2707" SST (Supersonic Transport): ![]() ![]() (images credit: Testpilot.ru) ------- America enters the race... Well, it was good while it lasted It all started in 1952 with small-scale studies of SST designs by Boeing, but things heated up significantly when in 1962 the governments of Britain and France decided to join efforts in the creation of a supersonic "Concorde" airplane. The intrepid Russians also came up with the Tu-144 (no less capable, but plagued by accidents). The American government nearly panicked and responded with its own program SCAT (Supersonic Commercial Air Transport) in 1963, which got endorsement from President Kennedy himself. The race for dominating supersonic airways was on. (At that time it was believed that all future commercial aircraft would be supersonic). The goal was to produce a commercial aircraft capable of carrying 250 passengers (twice as many as the Concorde) at Mach 3 speed and a trans-Atlantic range of 4,000 miles. Such was the dream, loftier than the European projects, which energized American designers and manufacturers, almost on par with the idea of reaching the Moon. Boeing 733 - from "delta wing" to "swept wing" design The proposed plane would be almost twice as large as the Concorde, cost two times more and require twice as much time to build, but it would be the "American Dream" plane, the future of the world's airways (FAA estimated 500 of such planes in use by 1990) ![]() ![]() Some initial concepts from the 50s: ![]() Conceptual development of wing geometry (with variations on delta-wing and swing-wing themes): ![]() (image courtesy of NASA) The variable geometry wing already had quite a history in US (read this article), plus there was considerable data accumulated by the military in developing the XB-70 "Valkyrie" strategic bomber and YF-12 «Blackbird» spy plane. Engineers of the new Boeing plane boasted that European supersonic aircraft is based on already nearly obsolete technology, and while American model may not be the first, it will certainly end up to be the best. Air tunnel testing of Boeing 733 model: ![]() Some of these concepts looked like F111 fighters with variable geometry wings (a legacy from the TFX program), the others could pass for the upcoming Rockwell B-1 bomber. Some progress was being made, but Boeing did not enjoy a monopoly on SST research for long - in 1964 the government started a competition for preliminary designs: "Boeing" and "Lockheed" were chosen, but "North American" (responsible for the X-15 Rocketplane) was strangely declined. Thus, two giant corporations were pitched against each other, and the design race nicely heated up. Lockheed 2000 - an honorable mention. This baby was admirably full-size: some models could transport up to 300 passengers with range of 3500 miles. The Lockheed mock-up was proudly presented to the judges in 1966, but rival Boeing-2707-100 already could take that many passengers and more, with better aerodynamics and less noise pollution. Boeing emerged the sole winner of the government contract. ![]() ![]() ![]() (images courtesy of Lockheed) Note: Space helmets on cute stewardesses were all the rage back then. See our previous article Glamour in the Skies for some Braniff helmeted uniforms, designed by Emilio Pucci. Boeing 2707-100: growing longer and sleeker... With engines now in the tail section (removed from under aircraft's body due to safety concerns), "Boeing 2707" still featured variable geometry wing and a distinctive two-hinged "droop-nose" - added for the best visibility during takeoffs and landings (its extra joint ensured better ground clearance). A new name reflected the fact that the plane's speed was Mach 2.7. It was decidedly bigger airplane, too. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boeing 2707-200: almost there... New 2707 had a tailed delta wing all over again - ironically, just like the rejected Lockheed entry. By October 1968 it was decided to abandon the variable geometry wing due to overwhelming technical problems. However, 2707-200 again grew in size, reaching (some say) truly monstrous proportions. To me it looks more like a futuristic "dream come true". ![]() ![]() Delta Airlines Artist Conception of swing wing 2707 design Size comparison: ![]() (images credit: Boeing) Boeing 2707-300: already 2 years behind schedule... The new design was smaller, seating "only" 234. Two prototypes were approved by President Nixon in 1969, and it was projected that SST would dominate the skies, rendering all other subsonic aircraft obsolete. ![]() ![]() Length: 306 ft (1968) 318 ft (1972) Wingspan: (1968) 174 ft extended 106 ft swept Cruising speed: Mach 2.7 or 1,800 mph Weight: (1968) 675,000 lb Passengers: 300 Altitude: More than 60,000 feet Power: Four GE4 turbojets Range: Transpacific, 4,000 mi ![]() ![]() (images credit: Hiller Aviation Museum) ![]() ![]() (photos courtesy: Ben Wang via Airliners.net) Soon, however, the project began to gather adverse publicity. The biggest complaint was "environmental/ noise pollution", such as sonic booms and reduction of the ozone layer. These concerns surprisingly gained a lot of weight in the government, with supersonic flights over land in the United States eventually completely forbidden. Also, at speeds above Mach 2.2 the aircraft would encounter "skin friction effect" and its body will have to be built out of either stainless steel or titanium, significantly increasing the price. The government (troubled by the Vietnam war) decided not to spend additional millions of dollars and completely cut the funding in 1971. According to Wikipedia: "The SST became known as "the airplane that almost ate Seattle." Boeing was a major economic force in the region, and was stretched so thin that a billboard was erected that read, "Will the last person leaving Seattle - turn out the lights?" Extreme costs in operating supersonics brought the whole idea to an unfortunate end, with the beautiful Concorde resting in a museum, and the skies dominated by sluggish, yet fuel-efficient subsonic jets. The dream still remains only a dream... but consider one interesting fact: when the government withdrew the funds for SST program, money (over a million dollars) poured in from American schools & kids. Well, children's enthusiasm could not save the project either. "The High-Speed Research (HSR)" program was canceled by NASA in 1999: ![]() ![]() (image credit: NASA) "Concorde" resides in a museum (appropriately in Seattle): ![]() ![]() ![]() NOTE: one of the most glamorous flights of French Concorde was during the full solar eclipse in 1973 - as a flying scientific laboratory. This page has a few more pictures. ![]() (image credit: NASA) But it's not the end of the story: ------- Meanwhile in the remote & mysterious Russia... TU-444 keeps the dream alive, and then some. The Soviet Tu-144 was the first commercial SST aircraft flown (built almost entirely with KGB & military technology). It was withdrawn after a short time due to crashes and problems, but not before making Europeans and Americans accelerate their own projects. Today, Tupolev Aircraft Design Bureau seems to keep the project alive and plans to come up with next-generation Supersonic Transport - Tu-444. Have a look: ![]() ![]() ![]() (images credit: Tupolev.ru) Some say that modern travelers are able to get anywhere on the globe within 24 hours anyway, so it's pointless trying to improve their flight times with expensive SST - but apparently people at Tupolev's are still excited by the idea of getting from Moscow to New York - and back! - in a day. The dream may live on, but the times when the governments raced each other to achieve a shared dream, are over. ![]() ------ Article written by Avi Abrams, @2007 Sources and further reading: Tupolev.ru, Hiller Aviation Museum, Testpilot.ru, Boeing, Global Security Military site Permanent Link... ![]() Category: Technology,Airplanes Related Posts: Dream of Solo Flight Radically Shaped Plane is Completely Silent Dark Roasted Blend's Photography Gear Picks: |
READ RECENT POSTS:
|
Extreme Small Boats & Yachts: Retro Coolness I'll Float Away, Hallelujah! |
|
Biscotti Bits Mixed Links & Images Incl. "Animals vs. Reporters" |
|
The Lady Vanishes Stealing the Most Famous Painting in the World |
|
"Dark Roasted Blend" - All Kinds of Weird and Wonderful Things, Discovered Daily!" DRB is a top-ranked and respected source for the best in art, travel and fascinating technology, with a highly visual presentation. Our in-depth articles in many categories make DRB a highly visual online magazine, bringing you quality entertainment every time you open your "feed" reader or visit our site. Connect with us and become part of DRB on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google Plus; make sure to subscribe to our updates. Our mobile site: http://mobile.darkroastedblend.com. You can also read us on iPad, as part of Flipboard popular free app, under "Cool Curators" category - see here. |
COMMENTS::
|
|
SF ART & BOOK REVIEWS: Don't miss: The Ultimate Guide to NEW SF&F Writers! Fiction Reviews: Classic Cyberpunk: Extreme Fiction Short Fiction Reviews: Lovecraft's "At the Mountains of Madness" (with pics) New Fiction Reviews: The Surreal Office |
READ MORE RECENT POSTS:
|
Awesome & Weird Chocolate, Part 2 Incredible, bizarre and (mostly) yummy chocolate ideas |
|
London Necropolis Railway Exploring little-known, morbid slice of London history |
|
Topological Marvel: The Klein Bottle in Art Impossible shape with no distinct "inside" or "outside" |
|
The Cutest Animals: Awww Update In our tough world we need a shot of cuteness... |
|
Glory of Early Aviation (1930s-1960s) Vintage Air Travel Posters and Airline Nostalgia |
|
Sleek Vintage Salon Hair Dryers Chrome Coolness, Gentle Breeze and Space Age Fashion |
|
Awesome Armoured Trains and Rail Cruisers Great symbols of power and "stable stagnation" |
|
Strange Deep-Sea Diving Suits Under Pressure... and Enjoying It |
|
The Golden Age of Cigar Box Art Elaborate Old Cigar Boxes: Visual & Historical Treat |
|
Thrill Ride: Bumper Cars Wonderful vintage & adapted bumper cars |
|
Futuristic Aircraft Update Inspiring, radical designs... |
|
Strange Eye Exam Charts Offbeat Optometry: Testing, Testing... |
|
Drinking of Absinthe: Dancing with the Green Fairy The Bohemian Realm of Absinthiana |
|
The Last Victorian Leviathan Steam Ship The "Great Eastern", one of the most spectacular ships ever built! |
|
World's Strangest Vehicles, Part 1 The Very Opposite of "Soccer-Mom Minivans" |
|
Some of the Biggest Spills & Accidents "Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes." |
|
Fictional Currency & Imaginary Money Money that’s literally out of this world |
|
The Ghosts of Antarctica: Abandoned Stations & Huts Entering "The Thing" and "The Mountains of Madness" territory... |
CATEGORIES:
airplanes | animals | architecture | art | auto | boats | books | cool ads | funny pics | famous | futurism | food
gadgets | health | history | humour | japan | internet | link latte | military | music | nature | photo | russia | steampunk
sci-fi & fantasy | signs | space | sports | technology | trains | travel | vintage | weird









































































































12 Comments:
What an interesting article. Imagine how different things could have been.
These concerns surprisingly gained a lot of weight in the government...
"Surprisingly"..? Have you actually looked at the results of the sonic boom testing done at Oklahoma City in early 1964, and at White Sands later that year? We're not talking fuzzy green Luddite environmentalism here... we're talking what the FAA and Boeing concluded would be millions in payments for physical damages per overland flight.
The article misses the fact that Concorde did indeed fly successfully and accident free for a great many years.
The TU144 was a great triumph both of soviet ingenuity, and soviet espionage, incorporating much of concorde's design.
Whilst a Concorde is in a museum in Seattle it is far from being the only one preserved.
One is at Filton, near Bristol, England, from where the first proving flights took off.
Truth is, Concorde was a triumph that worked, first flying in 1969, in service 1976, and continuing until late 2003. An airliner that flew higher and faster than any other, ever.
Whereas the Boeing SST was a pipedream that never materialised.
The interest of the governments may not have been as benign as the article implies. There is a story that - as a test - they once flew a Concorde out over the Norwegian Sea then had it cruise back over Britain at its normal height and speed, just to see how easy it would be to intercept. The answer was that it wasn't. It flew too high and too fast for anything in the UK to get to it before it had flown right across the country.
The noise problem was BAD. I used to work at Heathrow and many the time I stood outside Hatton Cross (tube) station as Concorde climbed into the sky. There was a longterm carpark between the station and the runway, which meant that Concorde passed over that even lower, and as the rumble of the plane died away you could always hear the blaring of the horns of the cars - their theft alarms triggered by the vibration. I often used to wonder how many travellers parked in there and got back to find that - for some unknown, to them, reason - their car batteries were flat.
Beautiful plane though!
soubriquet said:
"The TU144 was a great triumph both of soviet ingenuity, and soviet espionage, incorporating much of concorde's design."
May be Concordes' design was stolen from USSR? Tu-144 has it's first flight 2 months earlier.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-144
"However, even if this were to be confirmed, the documents were early development plans and would not have permitted the USSR's engineers to come up with their own aircraft; the plans could only serve as a general indication of the work of the Concorde design team. Moreover, Soviet aircraft designers in the 1960s had significant experience building delta-shaped aircraft, which proved an efficient means of achieving Mach 2, and TsAGI, of which Andrei Tupolev was a graduate, had developed extensive data about such designs."
Learn history, lamer!
It's sad that the Concorde is out of service, and that these airplanes not even got to fly...
Yeah, yeah. I'll believe the US can build a craft comparable to Concorde when I see it build a V/STOL plane that isn't 100% craptacular (especially when compared to my country's brilliant AV-8B Harrier). Until then, forgive me for thinking that you're way out of your league here.
Pfft. It's all about undersea magnetic trains these days.
Dear friends:
I uploaded some pictures of the SST Museum that my father took during our trip to Florida the summer of 1976.
Hope you enjoy them, the link is: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8767849@N07/sets/72157618299890370/
I will be uploading more pictures of the SST Museum soon !!!!!
Kind regards from rainy Mexico City.
Jose Carreno
Thank you Jose - great contribution!
All three programmes became surrounded in myth. The soviet 'steal' question was settled some time ago in a British TV documentary when Boing, Concord and Tu./KGB engineers all got together and reminised, their chat then being intercut throughout the telling of the story by narator/camera.
The ex-Soviets admitted that they had stolen a complete set of plans through the French end of the Concord programe but didn't use much from them as their design was already too advanced (in the process of procurment). The British and French designers looked at Tu blueprints and agreed that there was nothing 'really' Concord about the Tu.
Another story revolves around the fact that the Americans were so pissed off at A) the success of Concord and B) the cancellation of their own that they spent years not letting C. land at New york or other places useing the noise argument.
I lived under the flight path of Concord most my early life and still miss her at 11am most days. The roar of those jets was akin to a Bloodhound Missile, Minutman or small satalite launch-vehicle. It was the sound of mens dreams writ large, and sometime in the 80's under Thatcher, Regan, Schmitt and Miterresturant or whatever his name was...we stopped dreaming, the bean counters and grey suits took final control over our destiny and it's all down-hill now...
Pity they didn't consider the now-booming Asian economy - reducing the miserable trudge over the Pacific would bring in huge profits.
Post a Comment
<< Home